Non Webkit Browsers

1. Non Webkit Browsers Vs
2. Non Webkit Browsers
3. Webkit Browsers For Windows 10
4. Ios Webkit
5. Webkit Browser List

Tor Browser, Pale Moon, and GNU IceCat are probably your best bets out of the 59 options considered. 'Tor sets the standard for safe and private browsing' is the primary reason people pick Tor Browser over the competition. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. WebKit is a browser engine developed by Apple and primarily used in its Safari web browser, as well as all iOS web browsers. WebKit is also used by the BlackBerry Browser, PlayStation consoles beginning from the PS3, the Tizen mobile operating systems, and a browser included with the Amazon Kindle e-book reader.

• Using speech-to-text in non-WebKit browsers
• Delivering a Smooth Cross-Browser Speech to Text Experience
• Speech to text in the browser with the Web Speech API
• Using the Web Speech API
• SpeechRecognition
• Speech Recognition API
• Voice to Text with Chrome Web Speech API
• The HTML5 Speech Recognition API
• Speech Recognition and Synthesis in the Browser — Xebia Blog
• HTML5 Speech Recognition API. by Kai Wedekind

Update chrome windows. A basic use of web speech synthesis. Support in Chrome Canary/Dev Channel and Safari The Text to Speech service understands text and natural language to generate synthesized audio output complete with appropriate cadence and intonation. It is available in 27 voices (13 neural and 14 standard) across 7 languages. Select voices now offer Expressive Synthesis and Voice Transformation features.

By applying the x-webkit-speech attrtibute to an element, you can let WebKit browsers like Chrome use speech-to-text.

This way a user can speak to enter text in the textbox.

Which attribute can I use on other browsers to obtain the same effect?

3 Comments

I think this feature is only implemented in Chrome for Win/Mac/Android. That's because it's invented by Google and relies on Google's server to do the voice recognition. Any other browsers who want to implement this feature need to acquire voice recognition technology or work with a partner who has this technology. Thus I don't think this feature will be widely implemented in the near future.

The Web Speech API aims to enable web developers to provide, in a web browser, speech-input and text-to-speech output features that are the underlying speech recognition and synthesis implementation and can support Speech-to-Text peut reconnaître les différents canaux présents (par exemple, lors d'une visioconférence) et annoter les transcriptions de façon à conserver l'ordre d'intervention. Filtrage du bruit : Speech-to-Text filtre le bruit provenant de nombreux environnements, ce qui vous évite d'avoir à effectuer vous-même cette opération.

Chrome is the only desktop browser I'm aware of which currently implements speech input. Adobe premiere for mac free. download full version. Might also work in the Android browser, but I'm not sure. It's definitely not implemented in Safari.

I think this feature is only implemented in Chrome for Win/Mac/Android. That's because it's invented by Google and relies on Google's server to Professional and Intelligent Speech to Text Transcription Software. Try For Free Now!

x-webkit-speech is now deprecated. We should use

Both firefox & Edge are developing speechRecognition()

The account language and document language must both be English. Voice commands are not available in Slides speaker notes. Select text. Speech Recognition features in Portales, Portails, Senderos do not currently operate on any version of Internet Explorer. Please use MS Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari for this feature. Speech Rec is being blocked by a default 'Stop media with Audio' setting within Safari 11*. Steps to fix the issue: In the Safari menu bar, click the Safari

But back to the Web Speech API. As I said, I'd been keeping tabs on the specification for a while, checked out several of the demos and such, Safari Speech Recognition. Ask Question Asked 4 years, 8 months ago. Active 4 years, 7 months ago. Viewed 4k times 2. I have set up the Speech Recognition

Problem: WebKit mobile web monoculture. There is currently (still) a WebKit mobile web monoculture, numerous sites that have WebKit-specific content and reduced content/style/functionality for everyone else, despite numerous evangelists at Mozilla, Opera, and Microsoft working with web developers to publish standards-based cross-browser content.

What is Mozilla doing about the problem?

1. Studying the extent of -webkit- property dependence (Bugzilla 708406).
2. Prioritizing standardization for such properties that have high levels of -webkit- prefix usage on the web (text-size-adjust, CSS3 Animations/Transitions/Transforms).
3. Experimenting with some -webkit- prefix support to see if it fixes sites.

Is Firefox going to support WebKit prefixes?

• Very UNLIKELY - per our study of -webkit- dependent sites and experiments with some -webkit- prefix support see if it fixes sites (answer: very few, and even breaks some).

If so, when is that happening?

• We don't have a specific release or date yet. We are continuing to study which sites appear to require Webkit-prefixed properties, and if implementing them actually fixes those sites or not (WebKit-specific sites sometimes depend on other WebKit-specific features, e.g.: touch events, WebSQL, etc.)

For more details, read on, and see also

• 1CSS vendor-prefix compatibility
  • 1.1problem statement
  • 1.12Data on vendor-specific prefixes
    • 1.12.1Initial CSS properties dataset

problem statement

Sites that have WebKit-specific content and back-up content for everyone else.

-webkit- properties are used so much on mobile content in particular that non-WebKit browsers face a Prisoner's Dilemma problem, analogous to past quirks battles (e.g. 2003-4 era innerHTML and undetected document.all).

data: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708406

problematic sites

See http://people.mozilla.com/~atrain/mobile/Evangelism/chrome-compare/chrome-compare.html for a comparison of Chrome on Android vs. Mobile Firefox mobile/13.0a1 Nightly

Feel free to add specific problematic sites here so QA & Evangelism can investigate and follow-up:

• ..

See the tracking bug 739832 for more.

goals

The underlying open web goal:

• Open up the webkit-specific part of the web to other vendors in the same way that we had to be practical about what IE-proprietary or IE-only technologies to support.

straw proposal

• Prioritize standards for commonly used -webkit- prefixed properties.
  • CSS3 Animations (Mozilla ships unprefixed support)
  • CSS3 Transitions (Mozilla ships unprefixed support)
  • CSS3 Transforms (Mozilla ships unprefixed support)
• Consider implementing some -webkit- prefixed properties.
  • Experiment with implementation and see if that fixes sites (the efficacy test).
    • So far, efficacy is poor (very few sites are fixed), and there are negative side-effects (some sites got worse with -webkit- prefixes).

straw proposal downsides

• Unfortunately for the open web, implementing a -webkit- prefixed property (outside of WebKit) will nearly legitimize (make people assume they'll work forever) the use of -webkit- prefixed properties.
• ..

possible downside mitigation

• In the short term we can at least remove pain for web authors and users.
• In the long term we can ensure the unprefixed properties (in CR drafts) work and encourage authors to switch to them. Done for:
  • transforms
  • transitions
  • animations
  • border-image

See and try How you can help with removing -moz- prefixes.

Non Webkit Browsers Vs

questions and methodology

For sites in general:

• What are the thresholds (even approximate) for supporting an other-vendor prefixed property vs. not?
• How much of this is due to user-agent sniffing?
  • Is there an approximate % of top N sites that justifies it?
  • Is there a set of specific top sites that justifies it?
    • Could grab the Alexa 50 for mobile and compare side-by-side
• How should we consider occurrence counts of -webkit- properties?
  • Weighted by PageRank or equivalent?
• Severity of feature absence. Missing some properties breaks a lot more than missing others. Consider usability of page with/without the feature, not just how often it is used. E.g. tap-highlight-color does not affect the user's ability to use a website the same way text-size-adjust does.
• ..

For specific sites:

• *Which* sites will work *how much* better if we implement *which* properties?
  • The sites which are currently 'broken' should be listed above in 'problematic sites' and have a bug# for each one.
• ..

parsing other vendor prefixes approaches

• parse other vendor prefixed properties only in conjunction with parsing the equivalent unprefixed properties
• only do it for environments where critically necessary, i.e. mobile not desktop, to encourage use of standard equivalents.

unprefixing principles

• unprefixing things early (before CR) should be an exceptional case
  • what is the methodology for 'exceptional' unprefixing?
• unprefixing things must be evaluated carefully on case-by-case basis.
• unprefixing is not something to do routinely just to 'go faster' by a few months.
  • put the energy first into contributing and passing test suites instead.
• ..

See also: Policy for experimental CSS features in Gecko.

meetings minutes discussions

2010:

• 2010-05-10 Microsoft states support for a -webkit- property and then withdraws it a day later due to community feedback: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/iemobile/archive/2010/05/10/javascript-and-css-changes-in-ie-mobile-for-windows-phone-7.aspx in particular:

  'We've also added support for the -webkit-text-size-adjust CSS selector. This selector allows you to control how text on the Web page is scaled to increase readability for the user (you can also use -ms-text-size-adjust, IE Mobile recognizes both).

  .. [one day later] ..

  '[Update 05/11/2010: based on community feedback, we will only be implementing the -ms- prefix, not the -webkit- one.]'

• 2010-05-11 Jonathan Snook: Vendors using Competing Prefixes

2011:

• 2011-11-15 Henri Sivonen: Vendor Prefixes Are Hurting the Web
  • 2011-11-16 Glazblog: CSS vendor prefixes, an answer to Henri Sivonen
  • 2011-11-18 Infrequently Noted / Alex Russell blog: Vendor Prefixes Are A Rousing Success

2012:

• 2012-02-06 CSSWG - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0313.html (IRC log)
• 2012-02-07
  • CSSWG - http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20120207#l-550 , http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20120207#l-1066
  • blog post: http://qfox.nl/weblog/244 'Prefixed to death'
  • UBelly: Vendor prefixes: the good, the bad and the ugly
• 2012-02-09
  • Bruce Lawson blog: On the vendor prefixes problem
  • Eric Meyer: Unfixed
  • Christian Heilmann blog: Now vendor prefixes have become a problem, want to help fix it?
  • CNET: W3C co-chair: Apple, Google power causing Open Web crisis
  • Easy Designs Blog: This Must Not Happen!
  • Glazblog: CALL FOR ACTION: THE OPEN WEB NEEDS YOU *NOW*
  • Remy Sharp's blog: Vendor Prefixes - about to go south
  • Gilles Vandenoostende blog: On Vendor Prefixes
  • Lea Verou: Vendor prefixes, the CSS WG and me
  • .net: CSS vendor prefixes threaten open web
  • WebMonkey: WebKit Isn't Breaking the Web, You Are
  • YCombinator Hacker News: 'Long experience of contacting sites suggests that it is, at best, of limited effectiveness. ..' - hoppipolla at Opera on limits of evangelism
• 2012-02-10
  • Pam Griffith: Thoughts on all this vendor prefix nonsense
  • Robert O'Callahan blog: Alternatives To Supporting -webkit Prefixes In Other Engines
  • Web Standards Project: Call for action on Vendor Prefixes
• ..
• 2012-02-14
  • A List Apart: The Vendor Prefix Predicament: ALA's Eric Meyer Interviews Tantek Çelik
• 2012-02-15
  • Alex Russell: Misdirection
  • Dylan Wilbanks: Vendor prefixes and their discontents
• ..
• 2012-04-25
  • .net: Opera confirms WebKit prefix usage
• ..
• 2012-04-27
  • Dev.Opera: Opera Mobile Emulator build with experimental WebKit prefix support - has list of -webkit- properties Opera has decided to support so far.
  • WebMonkey: Opera Forges Ahead With Plan to Support WebKit Prefixes
• ..
• 2012-06-04
  • mozilla.dev.platform: Policy for experimental CSS features in Gecko - proposal by David Baron
• ..
• 2012-07-03
  • PPK: Vendor prefixes are fucking batshit crazy (troll?)
• ..

• change.org: Microsoft, Mozilla & Opera: Don't make -webkit- prefixes a de facto standard

FAQ

• ..

Next Steps

• Propose -webkit- properties to implement in Firefox Mobile, each based on specific data from bug 708406.
  • -webkit-.. due to prevalence of usage in x% of sites ..
• (none so far that are justified by the experiments done / data collected)

Data on vendor-specific prefixes

Here's a summary of the data collection and analysis that has been conducted regarding the use of various CSS vendor-specific prefixes.

The current datasets, collected by John Jensen, are:

Initial CSS properties dataset

• Completed in November 2011
• Summary of 88,000 CSS files from top 30,000 sites on the web, collected using Desktop FF 8.0 User-Agent
• Tables and summary reports in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708406
• Written report and summary tables are attached to the ticket.
• Summary file, in CSV format, is 620MB compressed, 7.2GB uncompressed, available at http://people.mozilla.com/~jjensen/css.csv.gz

Q and A

• how many sites in your mobile Webkit browser crawl use at least one of 'transition', 'transition-timing-function', 'transition-duration', 'transition-property', 'transition-delay' (ignoring prefixes)?

1245 / 30087 = 4.13%

• how many use them only with -webkit prefixes (no -moz or unprefixed versions of the properties)?

Non Webkit Browsers

336 / 30087 = 1.12%

• how many use them only with -webkit prefixes and unprefixed (no -moz versions of the properties)?

Webkit Browsers For Windows 10

365 / 30087 = 1.21%

• For each CSS prefix for which there are both -moz- and -webkit- prefixes, what percentage of domains host CSS that uses only the -webkit- version and not the -moz- or unprefixed version?

Larger, as-yet-unprocessed datasets

• Raw data downloading completed in mid-January 2012, using these UAs:

1. latest Android Native Browser from ICS
2. latest Mobile Safari UA

• Includes all HTML, Javascript, CSS files in compressed format
• Roughly 1.1m files downloaded for each UA

Ios Webkit

Webkit Browser List